Rent Games - Loans - Loan - Credit Counseling
seriously dudes... [Archive] - TrueNuff Forums

PDA

View Full Version : seriously dudes...


jamblo
10-14-2003, 03:35 PM
top work on busting out all the comics as promised 8)

Xelopheris
10-14-2003, 03:56 PM
This forum is for where the comics get posted, not discussion on Truenuff Itself. that goes in the forum labelled TrueNuff

Sláine
10-14-2003, 06:26 PM
Meh, I prolly would have posted the same thing here as well.

But hell yeah, sweet effort guys, thankyou so much, you guys are fantastic.

Threeboy
10-14-2003, 07:49 PM
it don't matter where he posted it, it makes me feel happy ^_^

Jace101
10-14-2003, 07:58 PM
By the way the comics rule! So true to life.

"Just one more round"

Haven't we all been there?

Threeboy
10-14-2003, 08:01 PM
I was there last night :D

jamblo
10-15-2003, 01:10 AM
This forum is for where the comics get posted, not discussion on Truenuff Itself. that goes in the forum labelled TrueNuff

I know the rules, dude, just knew it'd get seen more here :wink:


Truenuff, it's hot and I liiiiike it.

Odin1985
10-15-2003, 09:00 AM
is damn good to have you guys back in action, i think i was low on tn doze

Anonymous
12-19-2003, 10:29 PM
weed makes ppl hallucinate
thus jamblo is a pothead
cuz he was hallucinating wen he said that

Anonymous
12-20-2003, 04:38 PM
eat glass wowgfg....you suck.

Threeboy
12-20-2003, 04:38 PM
weed makes ppl hallucinate

it just makes you mellow out, THC is not a hallucionagine.

HawtPants
12-20-2003, 09:50 PM
weed makes ppl hallucinate

it just makes you mellow out, THC is not a hallucionagine.

welcome back to grade 7 Health class.

It's just an upper.

SiegeTheGrave
12-20-2003, 09:51 PM
word

Threeboy
12-21-2003, 05:31 AM
weed makes ppl hallucinate

it just makes you mellow out, THC is not a hallucionagine.

welcome back to grade 7 Health class.

It's just an upper.
i thought it was a depressant :o

jamblo
12-22-2003, 01:36 AM
excuse me? I'm a pothead?

//shakes head

phearor
12-22-2003, 09:25 AM
weed makes ppl hallucinate <~ as wowgfg would say


so whats wowgfg's exuse, oh thatz right he eats color pencils so thatz whats wrong with him.

SiegeTheGrave
12-22-2003, 10:38 AM
the only time that could happen...is if it was laced with something...and weed can be categorized as a depressant or an upper, it depends on the persons mood when they do it, their surroundings, etc...it's done different things to me at different times so i've learned from experience

Anonymous
12-22-2003, 09:16 PM
weed makes ppl hallucinate

it just makes you mellow out, THC is not a hallucionagine.

Yea you're thinkin of acid or angel dust.

Yep, rizzuh and those cops in cincinatti are proof of that, he thought they were cheeseburgers!

EDIT: I'm so very sorry about this inside joke I just made.

Rizzuh is the owner of cs-nation and we have had lots of fun over the years about his mythically huge weight.

For those of you that know of rizzuh and his weight, laugh plenty.

For those of you that don't....I'm talking about that 400 pound man that attacked those cops in cincinatti. He was on acid and angel dust.

Jace101
12-22-2003, 10:39 PM
weed makes ppl hallucinate

it just makes you mellow out, THC is not a hallucionagine.
Yea you're thinkin of acid or angel dust.

There's hundereds of drugs which are hallucinagines.

Pot is classified as a depressent, just like alcohol. It affects people differently so people don't get so "down" as other people may.

sYs73m
04-22-2004, 11:22 AM
By the way the comics rule! So true to life.

"Just one more round"

Haven't we all been there?

I'm there at least four times a week. Good game school, good game. =D

Budderfly
04-22-2004, 02:07 PM
YAY!!! I know it's off topic (or is it?), but it is True Nuff related.

"TRUE NUFF IS NUMBER ONE!!!"
(at least in the funny papers voting)

TN is also number 3 in the old funny papers"

Nice voting!!!

And for the record, I smoked a lot of weed when I was younger. All it does is make you hungry, red-eyed and sleepy. You don't see little pink elephants dancing or anything like that. Shrooms and LSD are responsible for that.

omgwtfdan
04-22-2004, 09:15 PM
It's number 1 now. Because TrueNuff fucking rules!!

sYs73m
04-22-2004, 09:48 PM
Indeed Buckshot, it does. =D

Threeboy
04-25-2004, 12:26 AM
keep voting :D

sYs73m
04-25-2004, 09:53 AM
I am, I am. =)

Hell, my vote at midnight on 4/25 made TrueNuff go from #2 to #1. The little news blob thing even said it. Only one vote on that refresh section, and mine did it. =D

Rawr!

willy wiggins
04-26-2004, 01:43 PM
In the case of marijuana, it also can be classified as hallucinogenic, in that THC is a psychoactive agent, any proof to the contrary is only an Appeal to Popularity.

J.Rai
04-26-2004, 03:17 PM
any proof to the contrary is only an Appeal to Popularity.Actually, any proof to the contrary is a negation of your statement, in that proof means evidence that proves a point.
__________________
J.Rai
Lawyer

omgwtfdan
04-26-2004, 09:09 PM
I am, I am. =)

Hell, my vote at midnight on 4/25 made TrueNuff go from #2 to #1. The little news blob thing even said it. Only one vote on that refresh section, and mine did it. =D

Rawr!

That happened to me too. Cool feeling.


---


How did we get to talking about weed? Let me end that off topicness right now by saying, "If you have any weed, gimme it now you fucking bitch!"

Ok... Back to TrueNuff!!

willy wiggins
04-27-2004, 12:48 AM
any proof to the contrary is only an Appeal to Popularity.Actually, any proof to the contrary is a negation of your statement, in that proof means evidence that proves a point.
__________________
J.Rai
LawyerHow insightful?

Threeboy
04-27-2004, 02:47 AM
i confused!

J.Rai
04-27-2004, 03:55 AM
What I meant is that you say that if I were to give evidence that marijuana is NOT considered a hallucinogenic, I'm only saying so in order to be popular.

But if I do show PROOF - EVIDENCE, that says that, then you're wrong, because I'm proving you wrong.

Therefore, you say that "I'm right, and if you prove me wrong, you're just trying to side with the masses" but in fact I'm trying to side with SCIENCE.

That being said, I've never known anyone who's "high" to hallucinate, thought I do sometimes see little cheeseburgers in their eyes.
__________________
J.Rai
Right

Lucien
04-27-2004, 04:17 AM
I'm with you mate, Marijuana is not a hallucigenic truck.

willy wiggins
04-27-2004, 10:28 AM
It doesn't induce hallucinations, but it can be classified as one simply because THC is a psychoactive agent, and no I did not mean proof, evidence, or what have you, excuse me for not putting " " as a mockery, I meant... "proof", in any case, I'm not going to argue, since this would be a "handicap match", me having chosen the weaker side, anywho, I'd like some "facts" that don't appeal to popularity.

willy wiggins
04-27-2004, 10:34 AM
What I meant is that you say that if I were to give evidence that marijuana is NOT considered a hallucinogenic, I'm only saying so in order to be popular.
J.Rai
Right
Oh sorry! didn't see you there 8)
from here (http://www.intrepidsoftware.com/fallacy/toc.php)
Appeal to Popularity: A proposition is held to be true because it is widely held to be true or is held to be true by some (usually upper crust) sector of the population. This fallacy is sometimes also called the "Appeal to Emotion" because emotional appeals often sway the population as a whole.

Examples:
i. If you were beautiful, you could live like this, so buy Buty-EZ and become beautiful. (Here, the appeal is to the "beautiful people".)

ii. Polls suggest that the Liberals will form a majority government, so you may as well vote for them.

iii. Everyone knows that the Earth is flat, so why do you persist in your outlandish claims?

Lucien
04-27-2004, 12:37 PM
Apeal to popularity would not be upheld in a court of law, because people are quite ignorant and easily swayed. Why should we be held to it's standards on this forum?

willy wiggins
04-27-2004, 01:45 PM
Because, being an intellectual, I look down upon it, my field is mainly debates, and Illogical Fallacies are not an acceptable practice, its relevance in a court of law is not in question, and besides that, why suggest that it would be attempted to be upheld in the court of law, this is not a trial.

willy wiggins
04-27-2004, 01:49 PM
Apeal to popularity would not be upheld in a court of law, because people are quite ignorant and easily swayed. Why should we be held to it's standards on this forum?We like to call that, a fallacy of False Analogy, not to mention Denying the Antecedent.

Lucien
04-27-2004, 01:57 PM
Because, being an intellectual, I look down upon it, my field is mainly debates, and Illogical Fallacies are not an acceptable practice, its relevance in a court of law is not in question, and besides that, why suggest that it would be attempted to be upheld in the court of law, this is not a trial.

Of course it isn't, but should we as decent mature people be held to a certain level of accuracy, rather than resorting to the common opinion of the public?

willy wiggins
04-27-2004, 02:32 PM
Because, being an intellectual, I look down upon it, my field is mainly debates, and Illogical Fallacies are not an acceptable practice, its relevance in a court of law is not in question, and besides that, why suggest that it would be attempted to be upheld in the court of law, this is not a trial.

Of course it isn't, but should we as decent mature people be held to a certain level of accuracy, rather than resorting to the common opinion of the public?We as people, are the public ourselves, I don't see your point, are you elevating yourself above the general population? are you somehow a better person for being here? are you not part of 'the public'?

Lucien
04-27-2004, 04:08 PM
I like to think that I am better than most people, yes, but that is just me.

Considering that this forum consists of a few, maybe 20 at the most, serious posters, I like to think that we are NOT the public, but a group of people sharing a common interest (TN).

Being accessible to the public does not make us the public, in my opinion.

willy wiggins
04-27-2004, 04:51 PM
I'll pass on that one, it's too obvious.

Lucien
04-27-2004, 04:53 PM
You do that.

willy wiggins
04-27-2004, 04:55 PM
I thought I already did, silly me.

Anonymous
04-27-2004, 06:12 PM
laa~

omgwtfdan
04-27-2004, 07:28 PM
Hey, um people... Anything can be posted over the internet. A website will not show me proof. If that was true then I could make my own website saying, "Banana's are made from Cucumbers. I have proven it with Science!" and then I could just make up a bunch of stuff that I did for a so called, 'Science Experiement'.

IE:

Problem: Where do bananas come from.
Hypothesis: Trees
Research: A website said they came from cucumbers.
Procedure: I chopped up a cucumber, grinded it with rocks and I got a banana.
Data: Cucumbers make bananas

See? That experiment was full of shit and I had you all believing me for a second.

Lucien
04-27-2004, 08:40 PM
No, I knew you were full of bullshit from the start. I never said believe everything you read.

omgwtfdan
04-30-2004, 09:26 PM
Of course you knew I was full of bullshit from the start. If you didnt, you would be full of bullshit, you bullshitter!

Thats why I hate School. Almost all of it is just reading and believing what is written. Shop is my favorite class because you get a hands on approach. Instead of reading, "If you use the bandsaw, make relief cuts, otherwise you could bend the blade." my teacher actually shows me.

School is full of bullshit. It shouldn't be all about assignments and tests. They're a good way to learn, but I don't think they do a good enough job. That's just me. It's kind of hard to explain.

Lucien
05-01-2004, 12:34 AM
Not hard at all.


However you have to accept that there will be those of you who learn best by hands on type work (The more inquisitive);

Those of you who work well by watching others (The followers);

And those of you who learn best by listening to those who explain the process (The believers).

omgwtfdan
05-02-2004, 08:59 PM
I think everybody has all three in them.

Somebody told me that hot air rises. I believe them because I had a good example: HOT AIR Balloons.

I watched somebody playing a video game that I had never played before. I learned tips from it and when I started to play it I knew the controls already because I watched them.

I watched a man cut out a board with a bandsaw. And he explained things to me about it. It looked easy enough. But once I tried it, it was hard to get use to. I learned mostly how to do things with it from my mistakes.

We use all kinds of learning every day. Personally, I like to learn from experience. It's just easier for me to understand it because I have witnessed it myself. That is why my faith slips from time to time. It's hard to believe when you can't witness the exact thing. And thats why I like movies. You get to see people's different point of view and actually picture it rather than imagining how it looked from a book.